The pros and cons of trying to eat everything

dsc_2949

The noble California Gull, a diet generalist

Animals eat different things. Every kid knows about herbivores vs. carnivores. Strangely, the other type of diet variation—diet breadth—is much less generally known. Generalists have broad diets, being able to eat a wide variety of things, while specialists eat only a few types of items. Anteaters and hummingbirds are specialists; the seagull who flew off with your lunch is a generalist.

Being a generalist gives a species a lot of advantages, especially in unpredictable environments. The more you can eat, the less likely you are to run out of food. An anteater without ants will starve, but a seagull without fish can eat crabs, or carrion, or Cheetos.

dsc_9260

Or whatever this is.

Generalists tend to be the species that are good at invading new habitats, because they are flexible in what they eat. They also tend to be the species that do well in urban environments—essentially a “new” environment, from the long perspective of evolution. Raccoons are generalists. Pigeons are exceptional generalists, not only able to subsist on trash, but able to raise their chicks on trash too—by feeding the chicks a protein-rich “pigeon milk” that the parents produce. (Most other birds have to feed their chicks insects, which may be difficult to find in the concrete jungle.)

Given all of these benefits, why do specialists exist at all? Why don’t the generalists outcompete them and fill the world entirely with flexible, omnivorous crows and gulls?

dsc_0828

Generalists unite! Take over the world!

Because there are some serious downsides to that diet flexibility. The better you are at eating everything, the worse you are at eating any one particular thing. In scientific terms, the “handling time” of your food items goes up: it takes you longer to 1) decide if something is food, and 2) figure out how to eat that thing.

An oystercatcher, specialist in opening and eating shellfish, doesn’t have to spend a lot of time wondering if shellfish are food, and can open them and eat them quickly.

dsc_8703

Black Oystercatcher, Victoria, BC

A gull isn’t so efficient.

dsc_8507

Is this food?

dsc_8515

No?

You can see the advantage of specialists in their specialized morphology. An anteater’s long sticky tongue and hefty digging claws makes him excellent at breaking into anthills and consuming their residents. A hummingbird’s long bill, curled and forked tongue, and ability to hover suits him perfectly for retrieving nectar from flowers.

In any shellfish-eating race, the oystercatcher would beat the gull every time. Which is okay: the gull can eat something else.

dsc_7246

Like tiny fish.

dsc_8948

Or all the scraps being thrown out by this fishing boat.

dsc_0860

Mmm fish tail.

Specialists succeed by being excellent at one or a few things. Generalists succeed by being okay at a lot of things.

dsc_0264

A squid! My favorite! (Red-legged Kittiwake, Alaska SeaLife Center, Seward, AK)

dsc_0252

Now, um… how do I make it bite-sized?

dsc_0086

I get the sense that you’re mocking me, which is ridiculous. Look how cute I am.

This can involve learning: as you encounter new foods and struggle with how to eat them, you discover new strategies.

dsc_8766

Yes! Got a crab. Mine mine.

dsc_8768

Not yours.

dsc_8773

Better carry it over here so no one takes it.

dsc_8824

This looks safe. Now I can eat it.

dsc_8823

So where is the food part, exactly?

dsc_8780

Maybe if I stand it up sideways?

dsc_8782

Maybe if I carry it a bit more.

dsc_8831

Huh. This is less edible than I thought.

dsc_8844

What do I see over there?

dsc_8861

Now this is mine!

dsc_8862

dsc_8866

But do you even know how to eat it?

dsc_8873

Oh. You do.

For a bird without a specialized shellfish-opening bill, shellfish locked in their hard shells are a particularly difficult puzzle. You can carry them around all you like, but if you can’t get inside, you aren’t getting food.

dsc_9236

I have a big food yay.

dsc_9238

dsc_9242

dsc_9248

Open sesame…

dsc_9253

I know what to do.

quintin_gull

Look out below! (Photo by Q. Stedman, _quintin_ on Flickr.)

dsc_9254

dsc_9250

Successfully broken.

Being a dietary generalist may be one driving force behind intelligence. The need to constantly solve food-related puzzles, to be creative and flexible, requires brain power. Some of the most striking feats of intelligence in animals involve using tools to get food: dolphins use sponges, crows use modified leaves, chimpanzees use sticks. Social learning, a prerequisite to what we call culture in humans, shows up again and again in animals solving food problems and then copying each other’s solutions.

Sometimes, as in the cases of tool use, these solutions looks very impressive. Other times, the solution just looks like an animal doing something it was really never built to do.

dsc_6235

What the heck are you doing?

Take these gulls, who have oh-so-creatively decided to imitate swallows in order to eat the tiny insects swarming on the mud flat. Never mind that their bills are the wrong shape, and they aren’t built to fly low to the ground like swallows. They just open their mouths, spread their wings, and run through the swarm.

dsc_6240dsc_6241dsc_6262

Then again, an animal doing something it was never really built to do describes a fair amount of technology-assisted human activity. So maybe I shouldn’t judge these muddy, bug-spattered gulls.

dsc_9262

That’s right: I am the pinnacle of intelligence.

dsc_2947

 

 

Advertisements

7 thoughts on “The pros and cons of trying to eat everything

  1. A fantastic photo blog. I think it all depends on the environment and the availability of food. If we look at a specialist like the Giant Panda, we think, how on earth does that make sense? But it did, before humans came and started cutting down its food source and its territory. Generalists are better equipped to deal with change, but specialists had the better hand at adapting to what was around them at the time.

  2. I often wondered about the opportunist gulls i saw on vacation–eating just about anything tourist food areas might supply—-in Arcadia Natl Park they swooped us for Oreos and in Cape Cod they harangued the diners for the paper cups of melted butter, and you mentioned cheetos–how healthy, or not, is this kind of food for them?

  3. I really enjoyed the captions with the photographs! Gulls are my favorite type of bird and I admire their resilience and adaptability. Your photos catch such fine but interesting details in their lives, and your captions make me smile with what seems to be perfect capture of what a gull is really thinking.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s