The pros and cons of trying to eat everything


The noble California Gull, a diet generalist

Animals eat different things. Every kid knows about herbivores vs. carnivores. Strangely, the other type of diet variation—diet breadth—is much less generally known. Generalists have broad diets, being able to eat a wide variety of things, while specialists eat only a few types of items. Anteaters and hummingbirds are specialists; the seagull who flew off with your lunch is a generalist.

Being a generalist gives a species a lot of advantages, especially in unpredictable environments. The more you can eat, the less likely you are to run out of food. An anteater without ants will starve, but a seagull without fish can eat crabs, or carrion, or Cheetos.


Or whatever this is.

Generalists tend to be the species that are good at invading new habitats, because they are flexible in what they eat. They also tend to be the species that do well in urban environments—essentially a “new” environment, from the long perspective of evolution. Raccoons are generalists. Pigeons are exceptional generalists, not only able to subsist on trash, but able to raise their chicks on trash too—by feeding the chicks a protein-rich “pigeon milk” that the parents produce. (Most other birds have to feed their chicks insects, which may be difficult to find in the concrete jungle.)

Given all of these benefits, why do specialists exist at all? Why don’t the generalists outcompete them and fill the world entirely with flexible, omnivorous crows and gulls?


Generalists unite! Take over the world!

Because there are some serious downsides to that diet flexibility. The better you are at eating everything, the worse you are at eating any one particular thing. In scientific terms, the “handling time” of your food items goes up: it takes you longer to 1) decide if something is food, and 2) figure out how to eat that thing.

An oystercatcher, specialist in opening and eating shellfish, doesn’t have to spend a lot of time wondering if shellfish are food, and can open them and eat them quickly.


Black Oystercatcher, Victoria, BC

A gull isn’t so efficient.


Is this food?



You can see the advantage of specialists in their specialized morphology. An anteater’s long sticky tongue and hefty digging claws makes him excellent at breaking into anthills and consuming their residents. A hummingbird’s long bill, curled and forked tongue, and ability to hover suits him perfectly for retrieving nectar from flowers.

In any shellfish-eating race, the oystercatcher would beat the gull every time. Which is okay: the gull can eat something else.


Like tiny fish.


Or all the scraps being thrown out by this fishing boat.


Mmm fish tail.

Specialists succeed by being excellent at one or a few things. Generalists succeed by being okay at a lot of things.


A squid! My favorite! (Red-legged Kittiwake, Alaska SeaLife Center, Seward, AK)


Now, um… how do I make it bite-sized?


I get the sense that you’re mocking me, which is ridiculous. Look how cute I am.

This can involve learning: as you encounter new foods and struggle with how to eat them, you discover new strategies.


Yes! Got a crab. Mine mine.


Not yours.


Better carry it over here so no one takes it.


This looks safe. Now I can eat it.


So where is the food part, exactly?


Maybe if I stand it up sideways?


Maybe if I carry it a bit more.


Huh. This is less edible than I thought.


What do I see over there?


Now this is mine!



But do you even know how to eat it?


Oh. You do.

For a bird without a specialized shellfish-opening bill, shellfish locked in their hard shells are a particularly difficult puzzle. You can carry them around all you like, but if you can’t get inside, you aren’t getting food.


I have a big food yay.




Open sesame…


I know what to do.


Look out below! (Photo by Q. Stedman, _quintin_ on Flickr.)



Successfully broken.

Being a dietary generalist may be one driving force behind intelligence. The need to constantly solve food-related puzzles, to be creative and flexible, requires brain power. Some of the most striking feats of intelligence in animals involve using tools to get food: dolphins use sponges, crows use modified leaves, chimpanzees use sticks. Social learning, a prerequisite to what we call culture in humans, shows up again and again in animals solving food problems and then copying each other’s solutions.

Sometimes, as in the cases of tool use, these solutions looks very impressive. Other times, the solution just looks like an animal doing something it was really never built to do.


What the heck are you doing?

Take these gulls, who have oh-so-creatively decided to imitate swallows in order to eat the tiny insects swarming on the mud flat. Never mind that their bills are the wrong shape, and they aren’t built to fly low to the ground like swallows. They just open their mouths, spread their wings, and run through the swarm.


Then again, an animal doing something it was never really built to do describes a fair amount of technology-assisted human activity. So maybe I shouldn’t judge these muddy, bug-spattered gulls.


That’s right: I am the pinnacle of intelligence.




8 thoughts on “The pros and cons of trying to eat everything

  1. A fantastic photo blog. I think it all depends on the environment and the availability of food. If we look at a specialist like the Giant Panda, we think, how on earth does that make sense? But it did, before humans came and started cutting down its food source and its territory. Generalists are better equipped to deal with change, but specialists had the better hand at adapting to what was around them at the time.

  2. I often wondered about the opportunist gulls i saw on vacation–eating just about anything tourist food areas might supply—-in Arcadia Natl Park they swooped us for Oreos and in Cape Cod they harangued the diners for the paper cups of melted butter, and you mentioned cheetos–how healthy, or not, is this kind of food for them?

    • A gull needs fat and protein, primarily. Sugars and carbs are not terribly useful. The cup of melted butter is actually pretty great (although I wonder how they ate it!); Cheetos and Oreos have some good fat, but the carbs aren’t great. All of this is fine in moderation. However, the gulls may run into trouble if this kind of food constitutes large portions of their diet, because it lacks protein – and also calcium, important for making eggshells. If a gull is mostly eating fish, crabs, insects, etc. and supplements with a few Cheetos, no problem; if a gull eats nothing but Cheetos, it’s going to end up with problems.

      Incidentally, this is also why it’s best not to feed ducks lots of bread, however fun it is to watch them eat it. Bread contains very little of what they need – little fat, no protein, no calcium. If a duck fills up on bread, it won’t eat the insects and plants that do provide those necessary nutrients.

  3. I really enjoyed the captions with the photographs! Gulls are my favorite type of bird and I admire their resilience and adaptability. Your photos catch such fine but interesting details in their lives, and your captions make me smile with what seems to be perfect capture of what a gull is really thinking.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s